An effective, adaptable website begins with selecting the ideal content management system (CMS) tailored to your organization’s unique needs. Whether it’s marketing, communication, or technical requirements, a well-chosen CMS can streamline content creation, enhance security, and support growth. Marketing teams look for intuitive interfaces to publish content effortlessly, while IT departments prioritize robust security, scalability, and customization options. Leaders focus on solutions that align with long-term business objectives and budget considerations. With a multitude of options available—from open-source platforms to no-code builders—the decision can feel overwhelming. This comprehensive comparison of leading CMS platforms—Drupal, WordPress, Mura, Craft, and Webflow—aims to clarify their strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases to help you make an informed choice.
If you’re contemplating a website overhaul or need guidance on implementing the right CMS, explore our web development services at New Target. We specialize in creating tailored digital experiences that meet your business goals.
The Evolving Website CMS Landscape
Over the last decade, the demand for more user-friendly, feature-rich content management systems has skyrocketed. Modern websites are expected to publish content rapidly, support engaging multimedia formats, and operate seamlessly across social media, e-commerce platforms, and mobile devices. Initially dominated by the “Big Three”—WordPress, Drupal, and Joomla—the market has since diversified with innovative solutions aimed at reducing the need for extensive coding. No-code and low-code platforms like Webflow are transforming web development by empowering non-technical teams, while specialized solutions such as Craft CMS appeal to designers and marketers seeking modern architecture. Meanwhile, Mura maintains a niche for organizations rooted in ColdFusion/Java environments. Both Drupal and WordPress continue to hold significant market positions in government, enterprise, nonprofit, and small business sectors.
CMS Market Share and Adoption Trends
Understanding each platform’s market presence provides insight into its stability and community support. While niche solutions can excel in specific scenarios, widespread adoption often correlates with ongoing support and innovation.
Drupal: A Niche Powerhouse
Market share: Approximately 1–2% of all websites utilize Drupal, with a notable presence among government portals and large institutions that prioritize security and workflow capabilities. Its prominence in high-traffic, content-heavy sites like universities and government agencies underscores its enterprise strength. Growth trend: Although overall adoption has slightly declined among smaller projects, Drupal remains integral to many large-scale, complex platforms, with about 6.8% of the top 10,000 websites built on it.
WordPress: The Market Leader
Dominance: An estimated 60–65% of all CMS-powered websites run on WordPress, powering over 43% of the entire web. Its extensive ecosystem of themes and plugins makes it the default choice for small businesses, publishers, and e-commerce stores. Growth outlook: While growth has plateaued in recent years, WordPress continues to be the go-to platform, especially in the U.S., supported by a vast community and hosting infrastructure.
Mura: A Niche but Stable Player
Market share: Mura’s usage is minimal—less than 0.1%—primarily found within organizations that rely on ColdFusion or Java-based systems. Specialized use: It’s favored by certain U.S. government agencies and media outlets like Scientific American. Its niche focus means steady, if limited, growth.
Craft CMS: Boutique and Growing
Market share: Estimated at around 0.1–0.2%, Craft appeals to design-forward teams seeking a highly customizable environment. Its presence among prominent websites indicates its strength in delivering bespoke digital experiences for mid-to-large projects.
Webflow: The Rapid Climber
Market share: Webflow powers about 0.8% of websites globally and roughly 1.1% of CMS-based sites. Its rapid adoption, especially among startups and creative agencies, is driven by no-code design tools that enable sophisticated visuals without coding. Positioning: As a competitor to platforms like Wix and Squarespace, Webflow is increasingly favored for its visual flexibility and ease of use.
Key takeaway: WordPress remains dominant in the U.S., with Drupal serving as an enterprise solution, Mura in specialized environments, Craft in high-end design projects, and Webflow gaining popularity among no-code users.
Ease of Use for Marketing and Content Teams
Choosing a CMS often hinges on how quickly non-technical users can adopt it. Marketers need an intuitive interface, quick content publishing, and minimal reliance on developers.
Drupal: Powerful but Complex
Learning curve: Drupal’s admin interface is more developer-oriented, requiring training for content editors. Although recent versions have improved usability, it remains less accessible than alternatives like WordPress. Editorial features: Once mastered, Drupal offers advanced revision control, workflows, and content moderation—ideal for large editorial teams managing complex publishing processes.
WordPress: Intuitive and User-Friendly
Simplicity: WordPress’s straightforward dashboard is familiar to many users, enabling quick publishing of posts, pages, and media. The Gutenberg block editor simplifies layout creation, making it easier for content creators to produce engaging pages without technical expertise. Usability: Regular surveys highlight WordPress as one of the easiest CMSs for daily content management.
Mura: Balanced Accessibility
User interface: Mura offers a decent balance of user-friendliness for marketers and flexibility for developers. Basic tasks like adding blog posts or images are manageable, but its smaller community means fewer tutorials and resources. Ideal for organizations with some technical support or CFML experience.
Craft CMS: Clear and Streamlined
Content editing: Craft’s control panel is praised for its clarity and minimalism, making content updates straightforward once the site is configured. Custom fields and a clean interface reduce clutter and confusion. Setup requirement: Initial site setup necessitates developer involvement, but ongoing content management is intuitive.
Webflow: Visual and Designer-Oriented
No-code environment: Webflow’s visual interface resembles design software, enabling marketers and designers to build and modify layouts directly. It offers an Editor mode tailored for non-designers to update content easily. While there is a learning curve, many teams appreciate how quickly they can launch and iterate on pages.
Summary: WordPress and Webflow are generally regarded as the easiest platforms for daily content tasks, with Craft providing a balance after initial setup. Drupal remains more challenging but invaluable for enterprise-level needs.
Customization and Flexibility
Organizations often require a CMS that can adapt to unique workflows, branding, and functionality demands.
Drupal: Limitless Potential
Framework nature: Drupal’s modular architecture allows the creation of complex applications, data models, and workflows. Thousands of modules extend its capabilities, supporting multi-lingual sites, user authentication, and multi-site management. Development expertise: Achieving this flexibility generally requires skilled PHP and YAML programming, but the result is a highly tailored platform suited for specialized needs.
WordPress: Extensive Plugin Ecosystem
Plugins and themes: With over 59,000 plugins, WordPress can incorporate nearly any feature—from SEO tools to e-commerce—often with minimal coding. Its block editor and Full Site Editing enhance customization, allowing significant design control. For large or complex sites, custom plugin development may be necessary, but most requirements are met efficiently.
Mura: Java and CFML Customization
APIs and integrations: Mura supports JSON and GraphQL APIs, enabling integration with Java libraries or CFML modules. This makes it appealing to organizations with existing Java-based infrastructure. Limitations: Its smaller plugin library means more custom development may be needed for advanced features.
Craft CMS: Developer-Driven Flexibility
Tailored content types: Craft allows precise definition of content structures, layouts, and front-end presentation without default templates. Developers can extend its API for custom integrations, resulting in highly personalized websites. Plugins: While its plugin library is smaller than WordPress’s, it’s sufficient for most advanced needs, with a focus on clean, efficient code.
Webflow: Visual Design with Limitations
Design freedom: Webflow enables pixel-perfect visual design through a drag-and-drop interface. However, backend customization options are limited; you cannot modify server code or add custom plugins. For typical marketing sites and portfolios, this is sufficient, but large-scale, custom back-end features are restricted.
Conclusion: Developers seeking maximum control often prefer Drupal or Craft. WordPress offers extensive versatility via plugins. Mura suits Java/CFML environments, while Webflow emphasizes visual design over backend customization.
Scalability and Performance
High-traffic websites demand a platform capable of handling rapid growth without sacrificing speed or stability.
Drupal: Enterprise-Grade Scalability
Enterprise deployment: Known for supporting large, high-traffic portals, Drupal’s caching and load-balancing features enable it to handle millions of visitors. It’s frequently used by government agencies and universities. Performance tuning: Requires experienced hosting and configuration but provides unmatched reliability at scale.
WordPress: Widely Scalable with Optimization
Handling traffic: With proper caching, CDN integration, and optimized hosting, WordPress can support very high traffic volumes. Major outlets like Time and NBC use WordPress at scale. Caveats: Excessive plugin use or poor hosting can hamper performance, so tuning is essential.
Mura: Enterprise Readiness
Java-based: Mura’s Java foundation allows horizontal scaling with load balancers. While public benchmarks are limited, its architecture suggests suitability for large-scale projects with capable dev and ops teams.
Craft CMS: High-Performance Capable
Lean core: Craft’s minimal footprint and built-in caching support high traffic. Many brands successfully run large, content-rich websites on Craft, especially when paired with optimized hosting solutions.
Webflow: Cloud-Hosted Solution
Automatic scaling: Webflow’s cloud infrastructure and CDN ensure sites remain fast, even during traffic surges. Its site item limits and plan tiers are designed for typical marketing sites rather than massive enterprise portals.
Overall insight: Drupal leads for intensive enterprise applications, WordPress can scale with careful optimization, Mura suits Java-driven environments, Craft handles large sites well, and Webflow offers reliable performance for smaller to medium sites.
Security and Compliance
Security is paramount, especially for sensitive, regulated, or government websites.
Drupal: Trusted for Secure Applications
Proven security: Frequently chosen by U.S. government agencies, Drupal benefits from a dedicated security team, rapid patching, and compliance with standards like FedRAMP and HIPAA. When maintained properly, Drupal provides enterprise-grade security.
WordPress: Vulnerability Management
Targeted platform: Its popularity makes WordPress a frequent target for attacks, often through vulnerable plugins. Regular updates and security best practices are essential. When properly managed, WordPress can be secure for most applications.
Mura: Moderate Security Record
Vulnerabilities: Past issues have been addressed through patches, but its smaller user base means fewer automated security scans. Organizations using Mura must stay vigilant and maintain timely updates.
Craft CMS: Generally Secure
Standards compliance: With rigorous coding standards and quick patching, Craft offers solid security. Its smaller community reduces attack surface, especially if best practices are followed.
Webflow: Managed Security
Platform-managed: Webflow handles hosting, security, and compliance at the infrastructure level, reducing administrator burden. Its SOC 2 compliance and automated patching make it suitable for most marketing and e-commerce sites.
Summary: For high-security needs, Drupal is often the best choice. WordPress can be secure with proper maintenance. Mura requires vigilance, Craft offers good security, and Webflow’s SaaS model simplifies security management.
Integration and Extensibility
Connecting your CMS with CRM, analytics, marketing automation, or e-commerce tools is often critical.
Drupal: Extensive API Support
APIs and integrations: Drupal’s JSON:API, REST, and GraphQL modules facilitate headless configurations and integrations with Salesforce, Marketo, and other enterprise tools. Its hook system allows deep customization for legacy systems.
WordPress: Plugin Ecosystem
Connectors for everything: With thousands of plugins, WordPress enables easy integration with popular marketing and analytics platforms like HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Mailchimp. Its REST API supports headless deployments for custom front ends.
Mura: Java and CFML APIs
Custom API development: Supports JSON and GraphQL, making it suitable for integrating with Java-based systems or legacy enterprise software. Limited off-the-shelf connectors mean more custom development.
Craft CMS: Developer-Friendly APIs
Headless capabilities: Built-in GraphQL and REST APIs enable flexible integration with third-party systems and custom applications. Its modular architecture accelerates tailored development.
Webflow: Embedding and Automation
Limited backend: Can embed custom code, connect with Zapier or Make, and utilize Webflow’s API for basic integrations. For complex enterprise workflows, this might be restrictive compared to open-source platforms.
Final Considerations for Choosing Your CMS
Your choice depends on several factors:
- Team skills: Do your marketers need an intuitive, low-code platform like Webflow or WordPress? Or can your developers handle complex systems like Drupal or Craft?
- Project scope: Is the goal a simple marketing site or a complex, multi-functional portal?
- Security needs: Are you working within regulatory frameworks requiring enterprise-grade security?
- Budget: WordPress offers low initial costs, while Drupal and Craft may involve higher development investments but greater flexibility.
- Integration requirements: For extensive enterprise integrations, Drupal and WordPress stand out; Webflow is more suited for straightforward sites.
Remember, the optimal choice aligns with your organizational goals, technical capacity, and future expansion plans. Proper setup, ongoing maintenance, and strategic evolution are essential to maximize your CMS investment.
We provide expert web design and development services to help you implement, customize, and maintain your chosen CMS, ensuring your website supports your digital ambitions. From initial deployment to ongoing updates, our team ensures your platform remains secure, fast, and aligned with your business objectives.
